Intro: “Missed me by that much!”
There are two ways in GURPS to “miss” a target with your attack: either fail your TH roll, or have your successful TH roll thwarted by the target’s successful defense roll.
The latter case is easy to understand: the attack was “on target”, but the target avoided it. This rule will only look at the former miss, the failed TH roll. I’ve always played this as the attack proceeding off-target, plain and simple: the bullet whizzed past the target, the sword thrust stopped short, and so on.
But other interpretations float about: namely, the idea that a “miss” might actually represent the attacker hesitating – perhaps failing to see an “opening” – and not attacking at all. I’ve avoided that interpretation, as it can create conflicts with known consequences of an attack. If the “attack” didn’t happen, why is the attacker’s axe now unable to parry, or his halberd completely unready? Why did he fall down from “missing” with a kick that was never made? Why is he suddenly short a bullet, arrow, or throwing knife?
Further, it’s artificial to imagine fighters always “circling” and “probing” in a way that allows hesitation. An enraged Ogre, a mindless zombie, or just a hero hacking his way through baddies to reach the heroine slipping off the ledge – none of these would “look for an opening” or otherwise hesitate for an instant.
Yet there are other circumstances in which “hesitation” does play realistically. And there are situations, such as when using DECIDE, in which the difference among no-attack hesitation, a true attack that misses by a hair, and a true attack that misses wildly have potential combat significance. Below is a suggestion for gauging these.
2013.03.03: Tiny update. Added “Useful hesitation” option for turning a hesitation into a free Aim or Evaluate. (Thanks to RyanW for the idea!) Cleaned up text concerning optional use with grazes. Added reminder to avoid hesitation while holding a primed grenade…
On any TH roll, melee or ranged:
- Success by 0+: Normal hit (unless avoided by Active Defense)
- Miss by 1 or 2: Hesitation (if regular or Defensive Attack) or normal miss (if All-Out or Committed Attack)
- Miss by 3 or more: Normal miss (Call a miss by 5+ a wide miss, if it matters for some other rules in use.)
Every result except for “hesitation” means that an attack was launched, with all normal consequences (weapon readiness, missile usage, etc.). “Hesitation” means no attack was launched, and no consequences of an attack apply.
“Normal” vs “wide” miss has no special meaning in the basic rule here; it’s included as an option for other rules that may be interested in that distinction (see note below on DECIDE).
In short, the rule can be restated simply as this: If you “miss” a TH roll by 1 or 2, and weren’t making an All-Out or Committed Attack, then instead of attacking and missing, you simply don’t attack.
Variants and options
If you’re a generous GM, let a result of “hesitation” count as a free Aim (ranged weapon) or Evaluate (melee weapon) action instead. The hesitant fighter holds back his attack, but still does something useful!
Using this site’s rules for grazes allows even more interesting outcomes in combat actions. Add the following to the above list of TH results:
- Success by 0: Graze (i.e., glancing or similarly weak blow). Give the target +2 on any Active Defense (or resistance roll if appropriate) versus the attack; if the attack still hits, halve its basic hits (or other effects) and double the target’s DR.
If using these rules with DECIDE, a rule suggesting that fighters should often make the decision to defend without knowing beforehand whether an attack will hit or miss:
- Hesitation triggers no defense by the defender; clearly, no attack came.
- A normal miss represents an attack that is not instantly obvious to the target as a miss; it triggers an “immediate defense”.
- A wide miss, or a critical TH failure, is instantly obvious as a miss, and triggers no defense. (In the case of gunfire, this would assume the defender can clearly see that the gun barrel is pointing well off-target. It may sound cinematic, but fits in with the general GURPS ability to dodge bullets based on this perceived path of fire.)
When to use it
The rule is of use to gamers wanting more detail in the outcome of combat turns.
The distinction between normal and wide miss is likely of interest only to GMs using DECIDE (though creative GMs could think up original house-rule effects, such as ruling that any wide miss leaves the attacker unfortunately exposed, suffering an Active Defense penalty for the rest of his turn).
The distinction between hesitation and actually attacking, meanwhile, can have combat significance in any game and might interest any GM, even when otherwise playing by stock rules.
I find the rule fun, especially with the “useful hesitation” option. It’s great for encouraging the Committed Attack option; just as the name suggests, commitment to the attack is the only way to be sure your fighter doesn’t choke!
Your playtest comments are greatly welcomed!
1. The little bit about Committed or All-Out Attack is important, solving the matter of fighters who shouldn’t hesitate. The above-mentioned Ogre, zombie, and frantic hero would all use Committed or All-Out Attacks, not cautious, semi-defensive regular or Defensive Attacks. The same goes for any PC who insists, “When I say I attack, I attack!”
2. Why place hesitation above normal miss on the failure ladder? The intent is that increasing degrees of failure should increasingly represent what a skilled fighter isn’t likely to do. Hesitation is less of a “mistake” than is a true miss: if nothing else, it keeps the attacking weapon ready, reserves the missile, and/or prevents some dangerous counter-attacks. A true miss, meanwhile – especially a wide one – is something that a skilled fighter should rarely display under normal conditions.
(But would you suggest re-ordering the items, Reader?)
3. The rules for Hitting the Wrong Target (B389) discuss a “straight line” threatening unintended targets. A wide miss might indicate a very unexpected direction for that line! It’s something for a GM to wing on the fly, or perhaps it’s fodder for future exploration.
4. Note that a result of “hesitation” can be really bad luck for, say, a soldier holding a primed grenade. Remember: When you need to attack without chance of hesitation, use Committed Attack or All-Out Attack!
It’s all simple enough, but it is useful to anyone beside me? What do you say?