Get updates!

Roll vs Search

Reply to comment

bignose's picture

New modifiers for new rules options

Tbone here: Doh! Bignose wrote a reply to say "I think DEFEND is a good idea, and an improvement, melee penalty and all. It would also work well with FEND." (My paraphrasing.)

Stupidly, I hit "edit" instead of "reply", and accidentally wrote over his comment. (Umm, better remove that ability from my account...) Sorry, bignose! I need to pay attention.

The best I can do here is give my reply to what I erased:

Yeah, things could work interestingly with FEND. Since that house rule cranks defense scores way up to start with, it then has to look for ways to bring them back down: increased penalties of various type, no PD (now part of 4e anyway), and a general penalty. Adding in a penalty for the "wait and confirm TH" defense would fit right in.

Still, as most people won't use FEND, and as I do like the game design goal of "no change unless an option is chosen" (which I normally try to follow, but forgot to do so here : ), I am leaning toward modifying the article to use the +1/+0 mods for melee.

Thanks for the comments!

Reply

  • Allowed HTML tags: <a> <em> <strong> <cite> <code> <ul> <ol> <li> <dl> <dt> <dd> <p> <br>
  • You may quote other posts using [quote] tags.
  • Lines and paragraphs break automatically.
  • Web page addresses and e-mail addresses turn into links automatically.

More information about formatting options


Build a site!

Make your own gaming home online!

THE TAKEOUT MENU

For collaborators, contributors, or the curious. Notice of site updates; project announcements; calls for playtesting; etc.

Syndicate content