Thanks for taking the time to post a new comment or a reply to one! First scan these quick notes, if you please:
General
* Currently, previewing a post is optional; you're welcome to preview or post immediately.
* You should see plain text input by default; click "enable rich text" for fancy formatting tools. (Some people love that and some don't. Be aware that formatting tool performance may vary by browser.)
* With apologies to all, I have to use a simple "captcha" question for unregistered posters. Otherwise, the spam flow will dwarf the Nile.
Registration and login
* Registration is available! Sign up here. Chief benefits at present include the ability to edit your own comments and manage subscriptions (newsletter, threads, etc.).
* If you'd prefer to post as an unregistered visitor, that's welcome too. Just leave "Your name" as the default "Esteemed Visitor", or type in some other name. (But if you happen to type in a name used by a registered user – say, "tbone" – you'll get an error telling you so when you hit "post comment". And while your post text should still be there, waiting for a revised user name, there's a chance it could disappear.)
* If you're a registered user but haven't logged in and want to post a quick comment as Esteemed Visitor, that's fine; see above.
* If you're a registered user but haven't logged in, and enter your user name under "Your name" when posting, you'll get an error saying that's the name of a registered user. That's a good thing; it means strangers can't make posts under your user name! But as above, there's a chance of losing your post text. It's best to log in first here, and then start your posting.
Final
All the above is standard stuff for community web sites, but reminders are good; I hate post-related glitches, and hate to see people run into them on this site. On this or any site, it's a good practice to do a quick "Select All" and "Copy" on your post text before hitting "Preview comment" or "Post comment" – just in case.
For more on the whole topic of interaction with the site, please see User Interaction (opens in new window).
Re: martial arts in games
Sat, 2007-04-14 13:11 — Rekres (not verified)Interesting news bit: In preparation for the World Cup games, police in Japan have developed a gun that shoots a 25-m square net over fans who bring just a bit too much enthusiasm to the proceedings. Specifically, the police are worried that their standard method to rein in rowdiness -- judo-based restraining moves -- may prove difficult against hyped-up, beefy European hooligans. (Like the police, we'll politely refrain from specifying British. Oops, just did.)
A comment from the World Cup security division, Sapporo HQ, Hokkaido Prefectural Police: "Of course, martial arts form an important part of our training, but if you take the size and power factor into consideration, (the restraining nets) could be more effective."
So, what's the gaming connection?
One: Net guns! Cool! What're the stats?
And two: The above is a nice little reality check against the misconception, perpetrated by rules in GURPS and other games, that martial arts like judo can somehow make physical power irrelevant (or even a handicap). Fun in a cinematic game, but wrong in a realistic setting. As the above police know all too well, while judo can do a heck of a lot to lessen a power disadvantage, in the end power still battles power. See GULLIVER for unarmed combat rules that reflect this.
Well, that's also the difference between cops who put only a few points into martial arts and the ancient master who has been studying the secret techniques since he was a little boy... :)