Thanks for taking the time to post a new comment or a reply to one! First scan these quick notes, if you please:
General
* Currently, previewing a post is optional; you're welcome to preview or post immediately.
* You should see plain text input by default; click "enable rich text" for fancy formatting tools. (Some people love that and some don't. Be aware that formatting tool performance may vary by browser.)
* With apologies to all, I have to use a simple "captcha" question for unregistered posters. Otherwise, the spam flow will dwarf the Nile.
Registration and login
* Registration is available! Sign up here. Chief benefits at present include the ability to edit your own comments and manage subscriptions (newsletter, threads, etc.).
* If you'd prefer to post as an unregistered visitor, that's welcome too. Just leave "Your name" as the default "Esteemed Visitor", or type in some other name. (But if you happen to type in a name used by a registered user – say, "tbone" – you'll get an error telling you so when you hit "post comment". And while your post text should still be there, waiting for a revised user name, there's a chance it could disappear.)
* If you're a registered user but haven't logged in and want to post a quick comment as Esteemed Visitor, that's fine; see above.
* If you're a registered user but haven't logged in, and enter your user name under "Your name" when posting, you'll get an error saying that's the name of a registered user. That's a good thing; it means strangers can't make posts under your user name! But as above, there's a chance of losing your post text. It's best to log in first here, and then start your posting.
Final
All the above is standard stuff for community web sites, but reminders are good; I hate post-related glitches, and hate to see people run into them on this site. On this or any site, it's a good practice to do a quick "Select All" and "Copy" on your post text before hitting "Preview comment" or "Post comment" – just in case.
For more on the whole topic of interaction with the site, please see User Interaction (opens in new window).
Re Breaking up GURPS turns
Thu, 2007-01-04 21:26 — tboneActually, I am experimenting with discretely separate mental and physical speeds, though not for GURPS. I will certainly report here when I have something interesting!
As for declaring actions in reverse order: that's what was used for initiative in Star Frontiers. Initiative losers first declared what they were doing; winners next made their decisions based on that knowledge, and then took action first.
It's an interesting system that was fun (and possibly one of the few innovative things about SF combat). On the other hand, it's a little hard to explain in RL terms. For the Initiative "winner" to know what the "loser" is doing, the loser must begin the action while the winner waits and watches, right? So it all works like the GURPS Wait action – though in both cases, it's hard to explain why the guy who waited always acts before the guy who didn't wait.
Nits have been picked. That aside, the system you outline is pretty interesting, and doesn't bring any exotic new concepts into play. Nice. My biggest reservation, on first glance, would be an issue I briefly mentioned: directly tying DX and/or skill to number of actions per turn. In your system, a DX 20 guy would get twice the actions as DX 10, as well as the huge +10 on combat skills. Granted, DX 20 should be awesome-and-then-some, but that is adding a big bonus to DX that should be balanced by extra cost of DX.
Or maybe you're already assuming that standard 4e TH penalties apply for Rapid Strikes, which would place an appropriate penalty on Mr DX 20 as tried to take advantage of his amazing speed potential.
In any case, it'd be fun to put the system to the battleboard test!