Thanks for taking the time to post a new comment or a reply to one! First scan these quick notes, if you please:
General
* Currently, previewing a post is optional; you're welcome to preview or post immediately.
* You should see plain text input by default; click "enable rich text" for fancy formatting tools. (Some people love that and some don't. Be aware that formatting tool performance may vary by browser.)
* With apologies to all, I have to use a simple "captcha" question for unregistered posters. Otherwise, the spam flow will dwarf the Nile.
Registration and login
* Registration is available! Sign up here. Chief benefits at present include the ability to edit your own comments and manage subscriptions (newsletter, threads, etc.).
* If you'd prefer to post as an unregistered visitor, that's welcome too. Just leave "Your name" as the default "Esteemed Visitor", or type in some other name. (But if you happen to type in a name used by a registered user – say, "tbone" – you'll get an error telling you so when you hit "post comment". And while your post text should still be there, waiting for a revised user name, there's a chance it could disappear.)
* If you're a registered user but haven't logged in and want to post a quick comment as Esteemed Visitor, that's fine; see above.
* If you're a registered user but haven't logged in, and enter your user name under "Your name" when posting, you'll get an error saying that's the name of a registered user. That's a good thing; it means strangers can't make posts under your user name! But as above, there's a chance of losing your post text. It's best to log in first here, and then start your posting.
Final
All the above is standard stuff for community web sites, but reminders are good; I hate post-related glitches, and hate to see people run into them on this site. On this or any site, it's a good practice to do a quick "Select All" and "Copy" on your post text before hitting "Preview comment" or "Post comment" – just in case.
For more on the whole topic of interaction with the site, please see User Interaction (opens in new window).

















Re Maximum human strength
Wed, 2006-12-06 13:17 — tbone'Ello again, DW. As promised, notes on my own attempts at game-ifying lifts:
My numbers are for a non-GURPS, in-progress home-brew. The rules themselves employ "log" stats, which will be meaningless out of context, so I've translated that to lift in kg (it's metric-based).
The base stats below are for a normal human. The source is limited data on "normal people" lifts, plus some reverse-engineering from record-setting lifts, plus a little self-measurement (based on a purely arbitrary guess at my own strength).
I put a lot of thought into the numbers, but now upon dusting them off a bit, they feel a bit low. Keep in mind that they're for a "base" adult, not notably athletic, and not necessarily male at that. They're also entirely prior to any sort of bonus from unusual effort or skill. So assuming for the moment that they may be realistic:
One-hand lifts
Two-hand lifts
Specialty lifts
Unlike the above smooth overhead lift, the below have the lifter raising the weight partway and then "slipping under" (pardon me if my terminology is far from professional). The numbers assume a successful skill check for proper execution (but no other special bonus for skill).
Notes
My ratio of Clean and Jerk to Snatch is 5/4, nicely close to your suggested 6/5.
I didn't tackle bench press, but I'll take your word for it: roughly 25% higher than Clean and Jerk. I can use that; thanks!
Now, what I don't recall is how I tied those to max human lift – i.e., what multiplier I used. I can probably dig it up, but the end results should be along the lines of yours; I'm sure we looked at much of the same record lift data.
And something I haven't done is explicitly tie max lift to lifter weight, as you have in this thread, other than via basic scaling: max human strength in my rules will generally require the scaled-up size of a large lifter, with appropriately scaled-up weight.
Whenever I make this skeleton of a rules-set public, it should provide a few interesting bones for the rules hacker crowd to pick over. Your notes on size and ST are helpful to me and to GURPS hackers as well.